this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
83 points (98.8% liked)
1753 readers
6 users here now
A Lemmy community dedicated to Google products and everything Google.
Rules
- Keep it Google.
- Keep it SFW.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That’s not what he asked. You still pay extra money for smart features that you do not use this way.
No, you pay extra not to have those. Smart TVs are typically FAR cheaper than an equivalent quality dumb tv because the price is subsidized by selling the data they collect.
You’re best buying a smart tv and just never connecting it or setting up any of the smart features.
From what I've seen dumb TVs are usually a few hundred more than a smart TV with similar specs. In fact, I've looked in the big box stores near me and can't even find dumb TVs. Even the crappy 32-inch 720p $200 Hisense is a smart TV.
So, I should have said " You still pay extra money for smart features that you do not use this way. And then to remove them".
You often pay less money because of the ads the manufacturers can shove down your eyeballs.
So yes, you don't need the features, but if they subsidize the rest of the device this way I can live with it.
Just keep it off the net.
How do you pay extra? That doesn't seem to be the case anymore at all. Smart features are just kinda standard now.
You understand that smart tv needs extra hardware and constant software development and that cost of those are passed to the customer, right?
You understand that those components are dirt cheap now, right? Stupid TVs cost more for a reason. Smart TVs pay for their BS with the data they collect. It's part of why they can be so cheap with decent specs.
You need small computer there. With self cost + margin + software development costs you typically talk about $100-$200 extra for 4K setup with decent performance. Just look at things like apple TV. I actually do not know, did not investigate how much equivalent dumb TV cost today, but my suspicion is that it is not extra data that covers the cost but