this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
-13 points (30.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43893 readers
870 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Only real hope in a situation like that is for consumer response to be so swiftly and demonstrably against it the measure that there's no time to normalise it. Legislation against this type of thing never happens and would be way too slow anyway. One would just have to hope it rolls out slowly enough that people can find alternative places to shop and send back that strong signal that this kind of shit can't happen.
One hopes enough people would hate it for that to happen but we tend to tolerate a lot. I don't think in the current format it would be tolerated by retailers or consumers because it's just too inconvenient and produces too much friction between a customer and the goods a retailer wants them to buy but if they refined it and managed to transmit the phone number or other even worse information via NFC then I think people would probably just shrug and let it happen.