this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
12 points (70.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39854 readers
1259 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud
Loki
CannaVet
devve
HybridSarcasm
[email protected]
12
Alternative to Home Assistant for ESPHome Devices (self.selfhosted)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by TCB13 to c/selfhosted
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello,

My IoT/Home Automation needs are centered around custom built ESPHome devices and I currently have them all connected to a HA instance and things work fine.

Now, I like HA's interface and all the sugar candy, however I don't like the massive amounts of resources it requires and the fact that the storage usage keeps growing and it is essentially a huge, albeit successful, docker clusterfuck.

Is there any alternative dashboard that just does this:

  1. Specifically made for ESPHome devices - no other devices required;
  2. Single daemon or something PHP/Python/Node that you can setup manually with a few systemd units;
  3. Connects to the ESPHome devices, logs the data and shows a dashboard with it;
  4. Runs offline, doesn't go into 24234 GitHub repositories all the time and whatnot.

Obviously that I'm expecting more manual configuration, I'm okay with having to edit a config file somewhere to add a device, change the dashboard layout etc. I also don't need the ESPHome part that builds and deploys configurations to devices as I can do that locally on my computer.

Thank you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TCB13 -3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I was trying to go that route with LXC actually and while it seems great what about the ESPHome addon? I'm not even sure if that thing is required to use ESPHome devices or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

It's not needed, and you can run it separately standalone if you do want it as well.

[–] TCB13 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s not needed,

For what exactly? Can I still add the ESPHome devices to HA without the addon installed, is the addon only for flashing the devices?

Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Correct, the discovery process where you add them doesn't actually involve the addon and works fine without it. The addon is just a wrapper for the standalone ESPhome web UI. It's also not the only way to author and flash a config to a device, you can do it from any computer and on the command line.

[–] TCB13 1 points 9 months ago

Thank you for clarifying this. I was aware I could flash devices on my computer (I did a few times because a few of my boards ESP32-S2-Mini have to be flashed once by the Flash Download Tool from espressif). Maybe I'll run the ESPHome WebUI on my computer or use the cli, I'll see.

I'll proceed to install the HA Core + HACS on a LXC container and see how it goes.