this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
673 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60091 readers
2729 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
673
George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’ (variety.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s to c/technology
243 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’::George Carlin's estate has filed a lawsuit against the creators behind an AI-generated comedy special featuring a recreation of the comedian's voice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Ha, okay we can shift away from the cases if you like. There really aren’t any that apply anyway.

I think the one getting confused, is the one who:

  • Said it’s different because it’s not human without actually providing any reasoning behind that logic.
  • Said it was essentially copy and paste, despite the content being new and unique.
  • Said it would be illegal if human, despite your inability to provide relevant case law.

You keep spitting out reasons, without backing up your claims. And when challenged on them you either ignore them, or spit out a new reason.

So what will it be, are you going to actually articulate your arguments beyond surface level, or are you going to throw out some back handed comment while continuing to downvote me the second you see I replied?