this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
550 points (94.6% liked)

Gaming

2490 readers
286 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (55 children)

I watched the trailer and read the steam description. I don't like how it treats and lets you treat the pals. My 8yo was very excited to see a pokemon clone game, and asked me to stop the trailer 30 seconds in because of them beating up the pals and using them as slaves.

[–] GorgeousDumpsterFire 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah because taking your pets to an arena-style fight to "fainting" is also a great model for the kids lmao

Pokémon's dog fighting aside, Palworld has a certain cynicism that imo takes it out of the realm of a kids game. The game allows you to capture humans and then has a little blurb about how it's "inhumane" to do so. There's a niche for an "adult" monster capture game that Palworld is filling. I'm curious about how the game will continue to develop in early access. They have a lot of funding & hype, let's see if they can see it through to a full release (or wallow in development like so many other Early Access survival games).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The concept itself is different from the execution though. She watches pokemon, and they regularly talk about respecting the pokemon and treating them with respect. Anybody who treats pokemon as an object without love is shown in a bad light; even team rocket is shown to have great love for their Meowth that they are willing to walk away from Meowth when they think Meowth would have a better life elsewhere. On palworld steam description, they literally say pals can be treated any way you want because they thankfully don't have any human rights issues. Kids don't think of the bigger picture, deeper meaning beyond what they actually see. The game is not a kids game, and that is fine. However, the game looks cute and charming, and very like pokemon, which makes me concerned for any kid who likes playing this game.

[–] JJROKCZ 20 points 5 months ago

They talk about treating them with respect… then trap them in poke balls and let them out to fight each other for bragging rights and entertainment. The people of the Pokémon world are the highest of hypocrites and that’s one of the main lessons that should be taken from that show

[–] GorgeousDumpsterFire 17 points 5 months ago

I think you're a great parent who interrogates the media that your child is consuming!

The aesthetic of Palworld feeds that cynicism; it's charming and colorful and awfully brutal. Parents should be aware of the game's content and the game should probably get a Teen rating (at least in the US; not sure how PEGI does their rating).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This seems like biblical levels of silly. Treating a slave creature well before you hawk it into the arena to fight for you feels a little morally nebulous.

It's a fun game, and laughing about the pals is totally part of it. The penguins special move is getting blasted out of a bazooka, and immediately passing out. It's hilarious, but if you think about it, it's really not much different from Ash Catchem tossing his pokemon into cage fighting rings. Palworld is honest about it, and injects humor that clearly makes you feel uncomfortable.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Yeah my Pikachu has severe concussion, broken bones an lung damage, but I give him little hugs and tell him I love him and it's all good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But at the same time, the human enemies are ones locking pals in literal cages who you can free. And none of the pals actually die when you are out fighting them in the world, they just pass out with Xs over their eyes. (Just don’t unlock the butcher knife)

Really the game lets you treat pals however you want, from never using them for work and doing everything yourself, to full on brutal working conditions. Choice is yours.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not even Xs, they get spirals. That's how you know they're just unconscious lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

most of them even keep moving

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pals out in the world definitely get killed. You get meat, leather, and organs from them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

You also get meat, leather, organs when you capture them

[–] rdri 3 points 5 months ago

Other people reply by how Pokemons are being in captive is a bad thing, and even though it's logical, I know what the Pokemon anime is. Like most anime, it teaches children kind and nice stuff, and the captive thing is ignored likely because it can't be applied in real world. No need to doubt - Pokemon is not bad for your child.

Palworld just allows too much freedom when compared to that. You either have to be an established person to understand what you're doing or play with your parents so they explain what your actions mean.

load more comments (53 replies)