Technology

59595 readers

2961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

430

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology

396 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have that exact same .jpeg stored on my computer and I don't even know where it came from. I don't even watch superhero films

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And if you tried to sell that, you would be breaking the law.

Which is what these AI models are doing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not selling it though, they're selling a machine with which you could commit copyright infringement. Like my PC, my HDD, my VCR...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they are selling you time in a digital room with a machine, and all of the things it spits out at you.

You dont own the program generating these images. You are buying these images and the time to tinker with the AI interface.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not buying anything, most AI is free as in free beer and open source e.g. Stable Diffusion, Mistral...

Unlike hardware it's actually accessible to everyone with sufficient know-how.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Youre pretty young, huh. When something on the internet from a big company is free, youre the product.

Youre bug and stress testing their hardware, and giving them free advertising. While using the cheapest, lowest quality version that exists, and only for as long as they need the free QA.

The real AI, and the actual quality outputs, cost money. And once they are confident in their server stability, the scraps youre picking over will get a price tag too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Literally what are you on about? I run my models locally, the only hardware i am stress testing is my own.

I don't support commercialization of anything, least of all AI, and the highest quality outputs come from customized refined models in the open source and AI art communities, not anything made by a corpo.

I think you must be literally 12 yourself if you think you can comment on this tech without even understanding models and weights are something you download if you want anything beyond fancy often wrong Google search, they're not run in the "cloud" like your fancy iPad web apps and they are open source.