this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
724 points (92.7% liked)

Standardization

453 readers
1 users here now

Professionals have standards! Community for all proponents, defenders and junkies of the Metric (International) system, the ISO standards (including ISO 8601) and other ways of standardization or regulation!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fahrenheit automatically disqualifies itself from being a serious unit, because it has an inconsistent scale

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This reply really confuses me - in what way is the scale inconsistent?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The original definition is using three points:

  • A random human's body temperature defined 96°F
  • Freezing point of Water defined 32°F
  • A weird Water salt ice mixture to defined 0°F

Because of that the scale of Fahrenheit was different above the Freezing point of water and below, requiring to redefine the temperature at the reference points multiple times (and not by an insignificant amount)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The original definition of Celsius (centigrade) was reversed with 100 being the freezing point of water and 0 being the boiling point. I'd say a "non-insignificant" change.