this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
453 points (98.9% liked)

Chevron 7

1353 readers
2 users here now

Chevron 7

A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
    • Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
    • Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
    • Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
  2. Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
  3. Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.

For more general Stargate content, visit [email protected]

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
indeed
453
May I say that this my first post on this community? (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by harry_balzac to c/chevron7
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Did I do it correctly?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?

[–] someguy3 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gunpowder. Yes in most cases you have to propel the object. What I'm saying is the physics of kinetics are there, that really can't be forgotten.

[–] Landless2029 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Even if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would've also worked the same.

The propellant doesn't matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn't think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy.

Hell they could've done some kinda sound based shockwave.