Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
The jury and judge agree that Trump committed what in new York is called "sexual assault" by violently forcing his hands inside Carroll's vagina without consent.
That is rape.
Or are you just advocating your support for "invasive sexual assault"?
You sound confused about what a convict is, since you keep using that word that does not apply here.
When you are in a criminal case and are found responsible for a criminal act, you are given the title "convict".
When you are in a civil case, and you are found responsible for an act, you do not use the title "convict", but use the term "liable".
The jury and judge looked at the evidence, decided Trump committed rape, and in a civil case, found him liable for what in a couple of states, including New York, must be defined as "sexual assault" instead of rape.
The judge went out of his way to clarify that Trump did commit rape, since violently forcing your hand inside someone without their consent is rape.
The jury said it was not rape.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/05/09/trump-liable-sexual-abuse/
I like how you keep trying to explain it when you don't understand it.
The jury said no. End of case. Even if they had said yes, it is still improper to say he's a rapist since as snopes explains, that would be false.
So have a good night
The jury said yes to the legal NY definition of sexual assault, also known as rape.
The jury was not allowed to use the word "rape" in their findings because rape only refers to penises in New York.
The jury and judge agreed that he did violently force his hand inside Carroll's vagina, which is rape, definitively.
It is weird that you're supporting sexual assault, battery and defamation, and the jury and judge made it very clear that trump is responsible for rape.
trump is a rapist.
Dude, just take your L and go home. Either you don't understand the material or you are trolling.
The jury made it very clear it was not rape. I have cited this three times to you. Since you kept trolling, this is my last response to you.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/trump-e-jean-carroll-verdict-rape-sexual-abuse.html
Providing the facts is not an L.
You're agreeing with me:
The civil liability you keep referencing, that Trump committed "sexual assault" by forcing his hand inside Carol's vagina without her consent, is rape.
trump is a rapist.