this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
694 points (96.6% liked)

World News

39154 readers
4396 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The next years are going to be fun… The world is burning while the fossil fuel industry is chugging along like everything is great as long as you buy enough co2 credits.

I’m scared in what kind of world my children will have to live in…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amesoeurs 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'm a severe weather meteorologist for a government org (non-US). This is alarmist nonsense. There is plenty of proper statistical evidence for climate change, it's bizzare that the opinion of one irrelevant meteorologist is being voted up to the front page. Most of the weather forecasters I work with know very, very little about climate change (as do most posters on here who love to type in short, sharp sentences to make themselves seem authoritative).

[–] 0ddysseus 21 points 1 year ago

If now isn't the time to be alarmed, when is?

[–] kinther 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when I see records being broken every year, year after year, I'm supposed to be like "This is fine".

Got it.

[–] JudgeHolden 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And your point is? Are you arguing that alarmism isn't called for? That everything is fine and we shouldn't try to mitigate emissions?

Or are you simply arguing that most weather forecasters know very little about climate change so.... I guess I don't know what?

Again, what's your point? Are you just flexing or do you actually have something useful to contribute to the conversation?

[–] amesoeurs 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Read my comment again. There is plenty of good statistical evidence for climate change, and if something is going to be bumped up to the front page it should be from a reputable source. Not "random nobody weather forecaster says thing"

[–] grue 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you think there should be a climate change article from a more reputable source on the front page, then post one instead of uselessly complaining. Put up or shut up.

[–] awderon 6 points 1 year ago

I think every article that gets people to talk about the problems we are collectively facing is doing it‘s job.

For some people this might be the trigger to have a deeper look into the topic, because a more relatable person for them is pointing out a problem.

[–] hark 10 points 1 year ago

Please share with us your vast knowledge on this subject.