Asklemmy

43943 readers

898 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What are some structures today that you think will become "anceint" structures in the future (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Something like the pyramids, or colosseum

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kjPhfeYsEkWyhoxaxjGgRfnj 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Large Hadron Collider could be an interesting candidate. It’s not very visible, but it’s unique, gigantic, and insulated from damage

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If abandoned I doubt it will remain insulated indefinitely, it would likely be underwater. A lot of random bits would survive though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's about 200m below the surface, but the surface is about 400m above sea level, so I don't think flooding is a major risk.

Cern has a risk assessment here :

Although the LHC is running through the territory of a few municipalities, only one of them had as much as three floodings between 1983 and 2004, the remaining ones even less than three [38]. As there have been no reported consequences for the LHC tunnel, a natural cause for flooding will not be the crucial factor for the determination of the probability of occurrence.

Climate change might change that but it doesn't seem like long term flooding is a major risk even if abandoned.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Flooding would be catastrophic even today, but it is not uncommon for rainwater and groundwater to fill spaces over time. Most abandoned US missile solos are filled because of rain and it is not uncommon for old, abandoned bunkers to be filled too. If we're comparing it to an "ancient" structure it can add up.

The LHC currently uses sump pumps to deal with natural water infiltration. Without those pumps the water can collect in the space. There are also installed sources of water that could leak over time, such as for firefighting.