this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
224 points (93.1% liked)

World News

32492 readers
640 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That would be doctrinal breaktrough, but the long strings of popes saying whatever they find convenient at the moment tuned the formal requirements for pope to be infallible pretty high. And i won't even mention that whatever cool thing Francis ever said as a pope have exactly zero influence on church reality.

[–] TrickDacy 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That would be doctrinal breaktrough

No it wouldn't. This is a standard way of talking about marriage in oppressive religions, including Catholicism

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

So by "relationships" he just meant "marriage" as church always did? It's clear from the context he is not, since lower there is mentions of "same-sex relationships", not to mention even the word itself suggest any something wider.

[–] TrickDacy 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think he's intentionally vague when using the word relationships. The word does not explicitly mean any one thing. But yeah sex within marriage has always been praised in Christianity. It's been a big selling point of marriage in general. I don't see anything in the article to suggest he's explicitly blessed homosexual sex or truly changed any doctrine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, if that was taken on a face value then the acceptance of all kinds of extramarital relationships would be a big doctrinal change, but nothing is happening, as i noted in my first post.