Selfhosted

40226 readers

1148 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Is there any product that can act as a knowledge base for topics (materials will include archived versions of websites, documents, media)? (self.selfhosted)

submitted 1 year ago by MigratingtoLemmy to c/selfhosted

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My apologies for the long title.

I'm looking for something to organise the materials I collect on various topics. As mentioned, these usually include archived webpages, documents/manuals, media (pictures, videos, audio) etc.

I know I could just create a directory system for this (and will likely do so if I can't find anything like what I describe), but just wanted to ask if anything like what I want exists.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MigratingtoLemmy 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, I do plan to use a organisation structure with plain directories. Please do share, it would help me greatly!

Indeed, I too plan to use markdown for any notes on what I'm looking at/is relevant to the object of interest.

Thank you for the note about archivebox, I didn't think about this before! Indeed, that would be very important: are you writing an alternative tool? Would you like to share the repo? I was considering just using wget to pull down pages but that might not work all the time.

Thanks a bunch!

[–] vegetaaaaaaa 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

organisation structure with plain directories

Slightly edited so you get the idea:

├── ARCHIVE
│   ├── DOCUMENTS
│   │   ├── 2018
│   │   ├── 2019
│   │   └── 2020
│   ├── WORK
│   │   ├── PROJECT1
│   │   └── PROJECT2
│   ├── DATA-MISC
│   ├── NOTES
│   ├── GAMES
│   ├── IMAGES
│   │   ├── MISC
│   │   ├── 2018
│   │   ├── 2019
│   │   └── 2020
│   ├── BOOKS
│   │   ├── IT
│   │   ├── DIY
│   │   └── NOVELS
│   ├── MUSIC
│   │   └── ARTIST - ALBUM
│   ├── SOFTWARE
│   │   ├── LINUX
│   │   ├── WINDOWS
│   │   └── ANDROID
│   └── VIDEO
│       ├── MOVIES
│       ├── MUSICVIDEOS
│       └── DOCUMENTARIES
├── DOWNLOADS
│   ├── DOCUMENTS
│   ├── WORK
│   ├── BOOKS
│   ├── GAMES
│   ├── MUSIC
│   ├── SOFTWARE
│   └── VIDEO
└── TMP

I use UPPERCASE for my base directory structure, so I know if a directory is uppercase it's probably part of the fixed structure. The key is to keep it max 2-3 levels deep.

Level 1:

ARCHIVE: stuff I want to keep, gets backed up
DOWNLOAD: stuff I did not have time to listen/look at/process yet. Not backed up (but I do backup a list of the files in this hierarchy).
TMP: stuff I use regularly but does not deserve to be archived/backed up (working copies of projects, random scripts/programs, VM disks...). Temporary, expendable.

Level 2: Broad topic or media type. Max 5-8.

Level 3: Finer-grained topic/media type. Only the ARCHIVE tree has this level of organization. There may be directories deeper than that but I don't actively manage them, they just... exist (extracted archives, etc.). One exception are subdirectories named NOBACKUP which are always excluded from automatic backups.

archivebox [...] are you writing an alternative tool? Would you like to share the repo? I was considering just using wget to pull down pages but that might not work all the time.

I am working on this tool which is a generic data manipulation/workflow tool. The shaarli workflow already works to grab bookmarks from Shaarli and download audio and video files. The webpage archiving module is still not written, it's the early design stage (issue), it will probably use wget in the backend, the alternative would be running a full headless browser and I don't want to get into that. This is my first medium-sized python project and I try to keep it clean, so it will take some time. Currently I'm more focused on other workflows/parts of the software.

As for file organization inside the directories, I try to maintain consistent/useful file naming including (depending on directory) date in YYYYMMDD format, author/parties involved, subject.