this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
127 points (98.5% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2347 readers
395 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Data provides more evidence older people should stay up to date on COVID vaccines.

Staying up to date on COVID-19 vaccines can cut the risk of COVID-related strokes, blood clots, and heart attacks by around 50 percent in people ages 65 years or older and in those with a condition that makes them more vulnerable to those events, according to a new study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The finding, published this week in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, should help ease concerns that the shots may conversely increase the risk of those events—collectively called thromboembolic events. In January 2023, the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration jointly reported a preliminary safety signal from their vaccine-monitoring systems that indicated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may increase the risk of strokes in the 21 days after vaccination of people ages 65 and older. Since that initial report, that signal decreased, becoming statistically insignificant. Other vaccine monitoring systems, including international systems, have not picked up such a signal. Further studies (summarized here) have not produced clear or consistent data pointing to a link to strokes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fades 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

semantics, it’s like trying to argue that you can breathe underwater or you can eat non-edible deadly wild mushrooms. Doesn’t mean you’ll be able to do it more than once but you can do it…

See how meaningless that is? No shit they have reasons for being antivax but when it is said “there’s no reason to not get the shot”, it’s very much clear they are talking about scientifically sound “good” reasons. Nobody thinks they are antivax for literally NO reason.