this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
580 points (95.9% liked)

People Twitter

5367 readers
1611 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slimarev92 57 points 11 months ago (4 children)
[–] AFaithfulNihilist 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, the "Spanish prisoner" is a scam that seems to be reinvented every few years every time we see a little bit of a change in technology. It wouldn't take much to fake a person's voice with a trained model, especially if that person has an online profile open to the public where they post content in their own voice.

[–] mwproductions 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Spanish Prisoner is also an excellent David Mamet film.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

A: The Spanish Prisoner is also an excellent...

B: ...excellent

A: David... David Mamet.

B: What I'm saying is, when it comes to excellent films

A: That's what I'm saying

B: (simultaneously) David Mamet

A: (simultaneously) Mamet

B: it's excellent

A: hm. The best.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist 3 points 11 months ago

The plot of the movie is very similar to the basic setup of a 419 scam, which was given the nickname "the Spanish prisoner"

I'm going to go ahead and check that out tonight. Looks like it has a great cast.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it has some sus vibes. I'm usually far too trusting, but here even my bullshit detectors rang

[–] Mr_Blott 14 points 11 months ago

You know that old adage "Never attribute to malice that which can be easily explained by stupidity"?

We need a new one along the lines of "Never attribute to truth that which can be easily explained by attention-starved teenagers"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I could easily conceive some tricks to get clips of a person’s voice without them realizing. I’d write them out but… that would be stupid of me. Humans have more vulnerabilities than computers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, unless this person runs a YouTube or podcast it seems implausible. What would you train a random AI on for the normal person?

I could see a situation where you hack a phone, get the contacts and call history, pick the 1st or 2nd most dialed number, have a bot call that person to get samples, then go back to the original phone and try this... I mean, eventually you'd get a hit?