Technology

59607 readers

3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

143

Apple Vision Pro available in the U.S. on February 2 (www.apple.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I honestly doubt this will take off, but it'll be interesting as a tech demo for what AR/VR can be at the highest end.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like it would work, except for very basic PSVR1 style games, where again they were hobbled by poor controller setups, where you could pick between several options that were awful in different ways. The Oculus Touch controllers were so much better for literally everything, and at this point are over 7 years old.

I mean, they can be fun too, Astrobot is pretty neat. You just can't compare them to a full fat experience like Half Life: Alyx.

4K per eye is great resolution, more than anyone really needs, but they're going to be relying a lot on woolly hand gestures, and as such is going to struggle even for simple games like Beat Saber.

There's an argument they're not going for gamers here, which is fair enough, but answering emails while having my glasses pressed into my nose isn't something I'm particularly interested in.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think watching apple's promotional videos will explain a lot of your concerns better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I had a look. I'm not immediately convinced it's as revolutionary as the iPhone. It's a fancier Quest but the battery is in your pocket rather than on the front of your face. Guessing the internals are similar spec to a regular high end iPhone or iPad.

It will almost certainly feel a lot slicker than the Quest, which isn't hard because the Quest feels like several layers of jank sellotaped together, but I don't think it's $3000 slicker.

Saw an article that claimed there were issues in a demo, but they weren't allowed to film and that Apple reckoned that would all be fixed before release. Smart money would be on those issues being present at launch.