this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)
RealTesla
486 readers
1 users here now
- Posts must be about Tesla, EV, or AV
- Meta Posts must be pre-approved.
- Shitposts are limited
- No Elon Worship
- All Links must include the original title of the Content
- Sites behind Paywalls must have text included.
- Don't be an asshole
- No Image Posts
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's disingenuous to compare a Tesla care that has far less autonomous capabilities with a car that is fully driverless. Tesla cars are more of a stopgap between "normal" cars and fully autonomous cars. To compare a Tesla car that requires a driver behind the wheel and one that doesn't is, in my opinion, a silly comparison. Of course they will have different levels of required sensors.
I agree that if LIDAR is too expensive, it's a hindrance into the changeover from "normal" cars to more self-driving cars for the average consumer. But again, to compare a car that has it's design goals to be for the average consumer based on price and a car that has it's design goals to be fully autonomous is silly.
Of course it's disingenuous to compare an ADAS and an ADS vehicle, but certain Tesla marketing personalities do it constantly. I'm not even sure I'd be generous enough to say that Tesla's system is a stop gap between ADAS and ADS since it's only a very basic ADAS in the first place. 🤷♂️
The CEO of this company was saying "Coast to Coast full self driving"
This is a quote from 2017. Elon Musk has never stopped claiming that Teslas will do this.