Gaming

3050 readers

510 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava

[email protected]

873

It's wild that they get away with charging for it (startrek.website)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/gaming

227 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] recapitated -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It honestly makes sense to pay for a service that needs maintenance in perpetuity.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then why doesn't steam on PC charge a monthly fee to use it's many extensive services? Just because they've given a reason for charging for something, doesn't mean we need to accept it blindly.

[–] Gunrigger 0 points 10 months ago

Because Steam wants your business. They offer their services in exchange for you buying more games on their platform. Initially they made these services for their own in-house developed games on the platform.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The consoles that had online functionality before the Xbox didn't charge for it, with the exception of SEGA Genesis' system that worked through your cable TV provider back in the 90's (and was so niche, not many people outside Japan had it). The Dreamcast and PS2 both managed to have online services similar to what Xbox provided, and they were completely free of charge.

[–] Gunrigger 0 points 10 months ago

I don't think they were similar at all. I loved the Dreamcast, but being able to play laggy games of Chu Chu Rocket on dial-up is not really a comparison to the dedicated servers, closed moderated ecosystem with chat/friends etc. that MS created. And that's just comparing to the early iterations of Xbox Live.