this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
159 points (97.0% liked)

Patient Gamers

10291 readers
4 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are there games that you tried but just couldn't get into because they feel outdated? Games that, in theory, you would enjoy, but don't because the controls, graphics, writing, or mechanics just don't feel good anymore. Games that, compared to today, just don't hold up to your standards.

I recently tried playing Heroes of Might and Magic III, and I realized that a lot of the invisible language used through game design from that era, I do not understand. There are many things that the game didn't explain, and I assume they were just understood by players. Not only that, but I imagine there was a lot of crossover between video games and board games back then, so maybe that language was used as well. I ended up downloading a manual and putting it on my second screen and I get it and played it, but it just wasn't for me.

I also dropped Mirror's Edge, but this time it was because of the graphics. It looks and feels great, but the graphics give me a headache. There is way too much bloom, and for some reason, there are some parts that look like the imaginary lens has been covered in Vaseline. This didn't bother me before, but my eyes are not used to it anymore.

There are also games like the first two Tony Hawk Pro Skater games that I can't fully get into because they're missing mechanics from the later games. The levels and controls feel great, but they don't feel complete without those mechanics. It keeps me from enjoying the games as much as the others.

Please share yours!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wizard_Pope 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I bought a bundle with all the 3 witcher games and tried both 1 and 2. I could jot even get through the tutorial in 1 and could jot beat the first boss of 2. Each game controls completely differently from one another.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I really liked Witcher 2 though. It's a good game.

[–] caseofthematts 3 points 10 months ago

Yea, I don't know. I disagree with the others. They're definitely not modern games, but I think they're both still quite good games individually.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That Kayran fight is one of the most unfortunate things about Witcher 2. It's far too difficult a fight for a first boss, and almost all of that chapter is a drag to boot. The game is so much better after that point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My favorite moment in that game is a serious case of understatement in dialogue prompt. You have an option to help one of two diametrically opposed people and if you choose "Help person A" you draw your sword on person B. If you choose "Help person B" you immediately throat punch person A.

[–] Wizard_Pope 3 points 10 months ago

Similar to how "push dijkstra aside" leads to Geralt breaking his ankle in a really violent matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Witcher 2 felt like something completely new when I started it up right after finishing the first game.

I imagine going from 2 to 3 will feel the same.

[–] Wizard_Pope 3 points 10 months ago

Not so much to be honest. The 3rd one is just way more open world and the combat is so much smoother and more responsive.