this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
25 points (93.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40570 readers
484 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Essentially looking for a shared drive that family members or friends can upload files to without having to make individual users / accounts Anyone know a good way to do this (self hosted or another service if Foss / private)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vegetaaaaaaa 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FTP requires a installing a thick client, is an old, insecure, complicated protocol, doesn't play well with firewalls... FTP must die! https://mywiki.wooledge.org/FtpMustDie. At least use SFTP (not FTPS) which is built-in to SSH servers and much simpler to setup. But then good luck explaining normal users how to configure a client (WinSCP is decent but sill requires some configuration) unless they are running Linux (most file managers support SFTP in a simplified way).

An alternative is Samba/SMB (multiplatform file sharing protocol Linux/OSX/Windows) - configuring it is a bit involved, but definitely doable. Client setup/file manager integration is OK.

But I would rather use Nextcloud for this, a simple web interface is probably more intuitive for non-technical users. And you get other features such as comments, tags... if that's your thing. Can also be accessed from desktop file managers using WebDAV.

SMB would probably have the best performance of the three, though. Depends on the number and size of files being shared.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting point. I'm looking at some alternatives, I didn't even realize just how insecure it was.