this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1194 points (98.1% liked)
Microblog Memes
6036 readers
2519 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As the other commenter said, it's not derogatory. He's taking a word that's been used to belittle and dismiss him and people that share his views, owning it, and using it to fire back against those that would use it against him in that way.
Basically, "Call me gay* (ok, like that's supposed to be a bad thing? Watch me call myself gay lol) but at least I'm not a dumb idiot follower of the redneck/MAGA agenda."
To me, it's like a more sophisticated "I know you are but what am I?", if you will. He's so unphased by the label that he uses it for himself with little hesitation, thus stripping its power as an insult against him. Hence why he fires back with a new, more critical put-down. It's meant to hit them (someone that would call someone else gay or a removed* as an insult) where it hurts, in the same way that person has meant to hurt others by using those terms derogatorily. He's literally naming and shaming the bigotry of the time.
*And yes I know the term removed has some nasty origins, but it was colloquially just a much more rude/derogatory way to say "gay person" when this song came out. I highly doubt the majority of people that used it were actually thinking that critically about it. The song itself at least very clearly does not mean it in the original sense.
Spot-on