this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
265 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2646 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At the end of October, the Bundeswehr said it counted 181,383 soldiers in its ranks — that's still some distance from the target of 203,000 that the German military hopes to reach by 2025. This has given rise to concern in times of Russia's war against Ukraine, which has once again reminded Germans how quickly conflicts can erupt in Europe.

Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career. He said he has received 65 concrete proposals from his ministry on recruitment and reforming training methods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Windex007 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Neo-Imerialistic Finland?

I think you really need to step outside of your US-based worldview.

Yes, absolutely, the USA has a massive war machine that has been mainly used as leverage to maintain an imperialistic status quo. You have the luxury of a US citizen of not living under the knife of an existential threat.

That luxury, your privilege, is not shared by counties in eastern Europe. Neo-Imerialistic, what, Lithuania? Estonia? They DO live under a real existential threat.

Your US experience is ENTIRELY valid.

Thinking you can apply that experience broadly is not.

The US experience is exceptional. That, plainly, is the reality of life on Earth.

[–] rockSlayer 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying that they don't benefit from neo-imperialism, or that they don't actively participate in it?

[–] Windex007 0 points 10 months ago

If your only tool is a hammer, then of course every problem is going to look like a nail.

[–] rockSlayer 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I went back and read your edit. A lot of mainland eastern Europe is in the position they're in because of the capitalist exploitation that occurred after the collapse of the USSR and Yugoslavia. They also benefit from NATO's imperialism. Considering that NATO has Finland as a member now, they also contribute to the exploitation of the Global South.

You're right, I can't divorce my stance from my material conditions. But that doesn't mean you should plug your ears because it's uncomfortable to think about. I do my best to stick to the facts, regardless of how uncomfortable it is to myself or others.

[–] Windex007 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not plugging my ears. I'm just ordering the coexistent issues by immediacy and impact.

Finland's compulsory service, in the grand scheme of things, makes no difference to South America.

Finland's compulsory service, in the grand scheme of things, makes a massive and immediate difference to Finland's continued existence bordering a belligerent nation with clear aims to expand its borders.

Like, you need to understand, the US military is designed to do MANY things, across the globe, as an empire would to maintain a status quo.

Finland's military, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania... These militaries exist for EXACTLY one purpose, which is self-preservation against a concrete threat.

Again, I think you're not wrong in your acknowledgement of existent factors. I think you're wrong in your relative understanding of the specific impacts for these countries in particular. Yes: there is human urine in the ocean, but it's not practically valuable to conceptualize a swim in the ocean as a bath in piss.

[–] rockSlayer 2 points 10 months ago

One small correction, the Global South is a post-cold war term to mean all of the countries that we'd call "underdeveloped" or "third world countries", not just the continent of South America lol. No shade, it was simultaneously hilarious and I suppose correct in a way.

it's not practically valuable to conceptualize a swim in the ocean as a bath in piss.

For one, I like this analogy. Secondly, I think I see your point now. Finland's impact is tiny, and for a vast majority of Finland's history they were watching imperialism and colonialism occur from the sidelines. Yes, the countries bordering Russia should be prepared for an invasion. Putin is currently occupied, but he's also kinda unpredictable. I don't think the countries in Western Europe should be quite as on edge though. It's anxiety inducing for sure to be a stone's throw away from a hostile nation, and a lot of people don't know or forgot what that anxiety felt like during the Cold War. I know I certainly don't know what that anxiety was like. I'm of the stance that all militaries are bad, if you couldn't tell, and therefore conscription is the worst possible thing a country can do to fill out their ranks. Frankly, it feels highly hypocritical to condemn Russia's conscription while simultaneously entertaining or practicing the option in the West.