this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
121 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40405 readers
849 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
121
Stalwart v0.5.0 (stalw.art)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Parachute4196 to c/selfhosted
 

Elevating Performance and Flexibility

We are excited to announce the release of Stalwart Mail Server v0.5.0. As we approach the end of the year, this significant update marks a major advancement in our journey to provide a robust, efficient, and versatile mail server solution. This latest version incorporates a range of performance enhancements, storage layer improvements, and new features, designed to elevate your email server experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AtariDump 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Too many people get malware that setup an email server and start sending out spam/phishing emails.

[–] victorz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's interesting. Is it easily preventable?

[–] AtariDump 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes.

ISPs block email ports on residential connections to prevent this.

[–] victorz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I meant on the part of the host. Would it be easily preventable on the server if the ports weren't blocked by the ISP?

[–] AtariDump 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not for the average person who pays for a home (vs business) internet connection.

[–] victorz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why?

I can count on no hands the amount of people I know who want to host their own email server on a residential connection (and that includes myself).

[–] victorz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Very anecdotal. 🤷‍♂️

[–] AtariDump 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] victorz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a shame because of the amount of people we know, or how many people there are in total, that want to self-host email. It's about the fact that it's so difficult to set up, and hard to secure. I just wish it were simpler and more secure by default so that more people could roll their own and break free from ad-ridden and privacy-invading email services. 👍

[–] AtariDump 2 points 11 months ago