this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
466 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59752 readers
2858 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AdamEatsAss 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

99% of non-cancerous cells were also destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't see the part of the article that mentions that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

If they didn't mention the opposite, I have bad news for you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't get this comment at all. Wat?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Killing cancer cells is easy enough, the hard part is only killing cancerous cells

[–] Konstant 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's saying it destroys all cells, cancerous and non-cancerous. Don't know if it's true, haven't read the article.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Obviously it's not true hence I don't get it. The holy grail is to destroy just cancerous cells, it's easy to destroy all. 🤷‍♂️

[–] JGrffn 8 points 11 months ago

The article makes no mention to the molecules only working on cancer cells. The molecules, according to the article, attach to cell membranes, and then the molecules are jiggled to blow up the cells. That process doesn't mention an ability to differentiate between cancer and non-cancer cells. The technique was tried on a culture growth, where a hammer would have the same results. It was also tried on mice, where half were left cancer-free, but little is said about the process, the specifics of the results, or what happened to the other half of mice.

We all get the goal of cancer research, OP is just doubtful that this achieves it, as am I, as well as anyone who's read good news about eradicating cancer in the past few decades. Most are duds or go nowhere even if initially promising, so...