this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
131 points (97.1% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2302 readers
300 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If it was never alive then how did it develop into a fetus?
Tissue can be unviable while still being alive (teratomas being an example).
Why are you so insistent on using a double meaning (of "alive")? The second definition you use isn't even widely accepted.
"get the attention of life ...should also be protected"
To continue living, which is what you are talking about right? I agree, the vast majority of people agree.
However I do think this is another example of you misusing semantic meaning to argue for a conclusion without saying it directly.
I don't think you're arguing that the woman's life should be prioritised, but that something else should be prioritised...like personal preference.
"Semantics or not"
God I love these kinds of people....just saying word salad thinking it means something, making vague to outright self-contradictory statements, acting smug regardless...
So if a fetus has no rights, then why on earth did you initially start with claiming that it did?
Why did you try to fake a pseudo-nuanced position, when it was obvious from the very beginning that you didn't believe it?