this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023

123 points (84.0% liked)

World News

39105 readers

2249 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

123

Blinken calls out other countries for not demanding Hamas surrender and ‘stop hiding behind civilians’ (www.cnn.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Stamau123 to c/world

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday called out other countries for not demanding Hamas surrender.

“What is striking to me is that even as, again, we hear many countries urging the end to this conflict, which we would all like to see, I hear virtually no one saying – demanding of Hamas that it stop hiding behind civilians, that it lay down its arms, that it surrender. This is over tomorrow if Hamas does that. This would have been over a month ago, six weeks ago, if Hamas had done that,” Blinken said during a press briefing at the State Department Wednesday.

“How can it be that there are no demands made of the aggressor and only demands made of the victim,” Blinken went on to say.

The strong comments from Blinken come as the United Nations Security Council continues to negotiate a resolution calling for a suspension in fighting and encouraging more humanitarian aid into the beleaguered Gaza Strip, and as the United States’ support for the resolution remains unresolved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So after this one is resolved and Israel violates the ceasefire does that count as starting again?

[+] [email protected] -12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What planet are you living on? Hamas will violate the cease fire on day one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like they did in 2008? Maybe 2012?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are we pretending they didn't?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes they didn't. The 2012 one held for more than a year despite Israel never even trying to abide by it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In the hour after the ceasefire was declared, twelve rockets were launched from Gaza into Israel. All of them landed in open areas.[217][219] Air raid sirens sounded in Eshkol, Sderot, Hof Ashkelon, Ashdod, Kiryat Malachi and Sha'ar Hanegev. One rocket over Ashdod was intercepted by the Iron Dome.[220]

In the section called Post-ceasefire incidents. source

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say who launched these, but given their actions after that (they didn't launch rockets and prevented other groups from launching them) those are likely not Hamas rockets.

On the other hand, we have Israel who didn't even try to follow the ceasefire.

The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR)[109] reported monthly Israeli attacks involving drones, missiles, small arms fire and airstrikes. Six of the deaths in Gaza occurred in the border area's Access Restricted Areas (ARAs, non-demarcated zones within Gazan territory unilaterally defined by Israel as being of restricted access), despite the ceasefire's prohibition on Israeli attacks on these areas.[31][109] OCHAO, more broadly sourced data, reported 11 deaths in Gaza and 81 injuries for 2013.[110]

In the first three months after the IDF Operation Pillar of Defense, according to Ben White, two mortar shells struck Israeli territory, while four Gazans were shot dead and 91 were wounded by Israeli forces who fired inside Gazan territory on 63 occasions, made 13 incursions into the Strip, and attacked the Gazan fishing fleet 30 times.[111] Israeli attacks on Gaza steadily increased during the second half of 2013, notwithstanding the decrease in attacks from Gaza.

Israel's violations in these two paragraphs alone are in the triple digits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

those are likely not Hamas rockets.

The fuck? You've got to be trolling right? Hamas brags about it's rocket fire. It's almost it's defining characteristics. Do you have any evidence that suggests it wasn't Hamas?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hamas brags about rocket fire outside of ceasefires. Do you have any evidence that suggests they were Hamas missiles? Again, my evidence is that Hamas actually followed the ceasefire (setting aside the attack we're talking about right now, it's confirmed that Hamas didn't fire rocket attacks and policed other groups to prevent them from doing so throughout the ~~conflict~~ ceasefire), and that they actually wanted it. Ceasefires are victories for Hamas, not something they'd want to get around.

Edit: Brainfart.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Do you have any evidence that suggests they were Hamas missiles?

Yes the articles linked in the Wikipedia page.

Ceasefires are victories for Hamas, not something they'd want to get around.

If you'd read the article you'd see that ceasefire for Hamas are routinely violated by them with no consequences.