this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
43 points (85.2% liked)

World News

32328 readers
683 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korkki 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

All of the sanctions and European energy security were banked on the idea that Russian frontlines would collapse under the super Nato equipped Ukrainian counterattack and then there would be a regime change in Moscow and gas would flow again. Now Ukraine is on the backfoot, there is no change in Moscow and Russia oil still flows to Europe, but only through intermediaries and loopholes, because there really never was an short to medium term alternative for it in the way the global oil market is structured. The sanctions were actual serious sanctions and their architects thought that they would actually work, but the decisions were made on faulty assumptions of effectiveness of sanctions and the structure of Russia economy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Sadly there were not very well equipped units in first place or there weren't many of them, because arms industry wants a perpetual war, not a quick victory. Looks like the oil faction doesn't know what arms industry faction does. Or they were simply delusional.

[–] AlijahTheMediocre 0 points 11 months ago

Super NATO equipped Ukrainians is funny, because for the most part they've always been under equipped. If NATO hadn't been so reserved and gave Ukraine a blank check from the get go they would have stomped Russia. Still no F-16s, Hungary and Republicans are stonewalling efforts being authoritarian sympathizers, and now Ukrainians are starting to feel ammo and manpower shortages.