this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1286 readers
126 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Icac says it does not want the DPP to consider prosecuting Berejiklian, despite ‘serious corrupt conduct’ finding...
does not want the DPP to consider prosecuting Berejiklian...

are you kidding me...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plenty of corrupt conduct doesn't quite meet the criminal standard. It's one reason bodies like ICAC exist. In this instance, it seems like Berejiklian should have declared her conflict and recused herself from dealing with these grants. But did her relationship actually change how she acted on them? That's harder to prove even if it was the case.

Edit: this page has info on the elements that constitute criminal misconduct

Edit2: oh yeah, ICAC also has coercive powers that allow it to get evidence that would be inadmissible in court. There's probably a bunch of that here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If her "deliberate ... corrupt conduct" doesn't meet the standard, in my eyes that means the standard is too high.