this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
42 points (97.7% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

263 readers
1 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are thousands of species of mosquitoes that don’t suck blood or spread disease. The most prominent 10 cause the vast majority of the destruction, and are much more valid targets then a random bird that Mao gathered peasants militias to kill.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seems like the issue is invasive species, a problem caused by people, rather than mosquitoes as a whole.

Removing all invasive mosquitoes is just cleaning up our mistakes and a lot less morally worrying than killing all mosquitoes just because they’re harmful to us. Of course getting rid of them because they’re harmful to us is somewhat valid, but getting rid of invasive mosquitoes is a good compromise anyways.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The problem here isn’t invasive mosquitos, it’s just that those invasive species have exacerbated the problem 10 fold as they are better breeders, more aggressive, larger, and more hardy then other mosquitos.

The problem still remains even if all of those magically disappear.

Also I see nothing morally wrong will valuing human life over an insect with limited to practically no impact in its habitants and niche.