this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
80 points (92.6% liked)

Canada

7275 readers
119 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Itโ€™s important to note, said Sialtsis, that major banks arenโ€™t handing out 90-year mortgages when people first buy a home; the changing amortization period is only happening on existing variable-rate fixed-payment mortgages.

FTA

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the original commentor is saying there should be a limit to variable rate amortization extensions. If the owner can't afford the current rate, then the fall into arrears.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Well the fixed-payment mortgages aren't exactly fixed. They will still get adjusted when the payment covers very little to no principal. For example mine got adjusted to get the amortization back in check when that happened. Maybe that's a choice the banks make, maybe CHMC dictates what's allowable or required there. If banks have to adjust the payments like they did for me, eventually the foreclosures will show up. Unless most of them are just under their trigger rates and the prime doesn't push them over the edge for a while. ๐Ÿค”

I don't disagree in the sentiment that payments should adjust and the non-viable ones should get foreclosed on, in general.