Fediverse

28228 readers

495 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

119

Adam Mosseri spells out Threads’ plans for the fediverse | The head of Instagram says a full integration with the fediverse could take ‘the better part of a year’ (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/fediverse

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zak 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I do imagine they have a dirty trick in mind and I'm not sure what it is yet. Perhaps they aren't either.

There's also an opportunity though. Threads users will get exposed to open source, independently-hosted alternatives they wouldn't have heard about otherwise. Some of them will switch. If those projects can offer a better user experience than Threads, more of them will switch.

[–] 9point6 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suspect the angle is something around avoiding regulation, they were happy with the previous "we're just a platform" arrangement where they could hold their hands up and waive responsibility for the content and users on it. Now that's actively being remediated by various governments, I think they're hoping they can make claims of reduced responsibility for what's on their site if it can come from elsewhere in the fediverse.

I'm not sure about specifics, but my gut feeling is that this is the angle

[–] Zak 2 points 10 months ago

I think if that's all there is to it, I'd be pretty happy with it. Governments can still attempt to regulate their use of algorithmic feeds regardless of the source of content.