Programming

17313 readers

9 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

I'm creating a curated search engine for web developers. Asking for a feedback (kukei.eu)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by sznowicki to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, in the era of increasingly good AI powered tools and general search engines full of SEO spam, last week I started creating something little old school and against the trends.

For now It's a have-fun-and-find-out project that main aim is to provide good search results for general web development queries with a special focus on independent blog authors.

The thesis is that no SEO spam website is in the index, which will already filter out most annoying noise on Google/Bing.

Search results are grouped per type: docs, blogs and magazines (e.g. blog platforms or bigger websites).

For now it's far from being done in terms of having a full index, but in most cases it already replaces my go-to search engine when I'm looking up some stuff during work.

I'm looking forward hearing out what y'all think and if you think it makes sense overall I can only encourage you to post some links to blogs or docs that are still missing in the index. I'm more than happy to add it to the crawler.

Responds like: "nei, total shit, who would need that" also accepted but constructive critique more appreciated ;)

EDIT: everyone many thanks for all your voices and comments. I'm super grateful for all of them and happy that we have such place like Lemmy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think the main issue as well as my main question is around scope.

You say targets we developers, but the current index is quite narrow. So will you accept significant expansion of that, as long as it may be relevant to Web developers? Where would you draw lines on mixed c content or technologies?

ASP.NET docs is definitely docs for web developers. But maybe not what you had in mind. Would that apply? The docs are h hosted on a platform with a lot of other docs of the dotnet space. Some may be relevant to "Web developers", others not. And the line is subjective and dynamic.

My website has some technological development resources and blog posts. But also very different things. Would that fit into scope or not?

How narrow out broad would you make the index?

I guess it's an index for search, so noise shouldn't be a problem as long as there are gains through/of quality content.

[–] sznowicki 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's still in MVP, work in progress, hence the index is not "full".

For me "web development" is everything that we might need for well, web. Servers, mongo docs all goes into the index (I'm adding it every day basically but also it takes some time to index stuff and I observe how this whole thing works as index grows).

ASP.NET goes into the index of course. If your website has dev resources and blog posts that would go into it as well. Recently one person suggested tons of Haskell blogs and they are being indexed as we speak.

I have also a different problem, dev.to has a lot of good resources but also tons of SEO spam and low quality content. It's also freaking huge and while it was for some time in the index I had to remove it and think about it some more.

Where would you draw lines on mixed c content or technologies

For now the line is: does this website have anything that web devs would need? Yes? Then it might get in.

If it's a blog about locomotive CPU programming then maybe not. Although mostly due to infrastructure costs. Indexing cost in the end but having some non related stuff in the index should not hurt the results.

All of what I wrote is the state for today. I'm changing my mind often as it's still in "having fun" state.

PS. also thanks for the feedback!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have also a different problem, dev.to has a lot of good resources but also tons of SEO spam and low quality content. It’s also freaking huge and while it was for some time in the index I had to remove it and think about it some more.

Yeah, a public platform is unlikely to provide consistent content. If curation is not an explicit goal and practice there, I would not include them for the reasons you mentioned.

If indexing could happen not on domain but with more granular filters - URL base paths - that may be viable. Indexing specific authors on devto.

[–] sznowicki 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good idea. I had this thought once to do some narrow indexing of websites, e.g. stack overflow is a big issue, indexing all of this is crazy, picking up some specific tags on the other hand feels like tons of work. In the end I adjust the whole project as it grows with hope that after every tuning it gets better.

As long as I have fun with it I’ll continue :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Of course - cutting scope is a good call to keep it manageable and fun, and not end up with creep and what you wanted to evade in the first place. :)