this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
989 points (79.1% liked)

Fediverse

28696 readers
653 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Then you're evil. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Go ahead, be evil. It is certainly your prerogative.

Edit: just look at how many votes "But what if some of us don't care if they're evil?" got. Like, what a wild-ass bullshit thing to say. This thread is definitely being astroturfed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've noticed a lot of turfing on all of these threadsfed posts. It's becoming more and more. People just need to get a threads account if it's so important to them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well they're clearly aware of us, we can't pretend we're just a bunch of silly little beans doing our own thing anymore. Of course they're going to do this. There is literally not a single reason for them not to.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It just sucks how rapidly it's becoming. Can't even spend a year in bliss before the shitheels arrive.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if you no come to facebook, facebook come to you

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sad but true. I think the only way anything could ever be restored to the bygone tangible days of the Internet would be to destroy Meta, fully.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but the reason we need federation in the first place is because of the relentless onslaught of monopoly.

I think this is a good prpblem to have. The fediverse gets to test itself against the largest established social media network, and honestly I don't see a way for them to win. You can ses it in these replies - they are scared of this boycott. Even more exciting now that I think of if - this isn't a consumer boycott like we're used to. This is a boycott by the producers. The instances create the network, so their voices are much more important.

[–] 2deck 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is exciting. I've been impressed by the response to this. Reading between the astroturfing, there's a community with a sense of purpose here.

Thanks to all who are here genuinely!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm old enough to know better than be excited. I haven't seen a single good community have staying power in the time of the entire internet. And it's only getting worse. Especially when a billion dollar tumor takes interest in where you're at.

What I do find interesting and alarming is how aggressive Meta is in seeking out the small inconsequential pockets of the Internet and crushing them. They're so deadset on fuxing any collective not being monitored by their government backed all seeing eye. It will be interesting to see how a federated social network holds up but I wouldn't assume they don't already have at least five game plans to crush it.

[–] Draconic_NEO 2 points 1 year ago

We should have rules against turfing like this in the community, and remove or ban people suspected of it. I get the benefits of having a neutral place but at the same time we don't allow advertising here so why should suspected astroturfing be any different.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's sarcasm. I upvoted them because I would have said something similar to highlight the absurdity of any argument against defederating with Threads.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read their replies. They are apparently being sincere. You have fallen victim to Poe's law.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)