22
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)
Gaming
2160 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hate big game companies as much as the next guy but this is the most immature, entitled take ever. So much so that I'd think for sure that you were trolling if I wasn't on this website.
EULAs are just that: an agreement. Don't like the terms, then don't accept them. Literally no one in the world has ever been forced to play an Ubisoft game and I have very little sympathy for anyone who still plays them, but expecting Ubisoft to make their games public domain and open-source (with most of the games' backbone probably still being used today) makes you sound like a child who didn't get their way on the playground.
The EULAs that you have to accept after you've already purchased the game? Yeah, such a fair proposition they make. There should be some mechanism in place to prevent games like this from disappearing, because it's actively destroying the medium, but until then, the best I can do is not put any time or money into an game with a killswitch.
No, I mean the EULAs that can be read for free online before you even buy the game (recent Ubisoft game for example). Or, if any proactive effort is too difficult for you, Steam will refund your full purchase as long as you have less than two hours of play time.
I agree. You're not entitled to the labor of others, even if those others are shitty videogame corporations. Ubisoft has the right to manage their IPs however they want.
Where does one find the EULA for a game on the shelf when they buy it at Walmart? Don't defend companies for shitty practices in need of legal reform. At least, before you resorted to namecalling the person you replied to before, you still have some argument to stand on, but this isn't being entitled to the labor of others; it's being entitled to use the thing that you bought. Their labor was already done.
I suggested delisted games, that generate no income, should become public domain. I also suggested that the servers of delisted online games, that also generate no income should go open source.
As far as the EULA is concerned, I said that they should rent but they should sell, as they did a few years back. The corporations CHANGED their policies not the consumer. The way they conduct business, drives people who are a little tech savvy to switch to the high seas.
If they are immoral enough to "rent" a piece of software instead of selling it, thus rendering it unusable after a period of time, then I don't blame some one for pirating this piece of software after it's "delisted" or "removed"
You should read carefully the comments my friend