this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
483 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60080 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't even have to go extremely rural to get no internet choices.

I am 20 minutes, or 15 miles, from a town of 150,000 people down 1 of the 4 major roads leading out of town. Without cellular or starlink we would have nothing.

[–] guacupado 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right, but the point is, instead of going to Starlink that taxpayer money could be used to get access to where you're at.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Comcast will take the taxpayer money, run a shit 5mbps line to the rural area, charge you out the ass for it and pocket the difference from the subsidies.

[–] SupraMario 6 points 1 year ago

They already did that....we gave the telecoms almost 1 trillion dollars...we do not need to be giving them more.