this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
53 points (94.9% liked)

Sociology

51 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to c/sociology!

Sociology is a social science that focuses on society, human social behavior, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and aspects of culture associated with everyday life. In simple words sociology is the scientific study of society. It uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order and social change. While some sociologists conduct research that may be applied directly to social policy and welfare, others focus primarily on refining the theoretical understanding of social processes and phenomenological method. Subject matter can range from micro-level analyses of society (i.e. of individual interaction and agency) to macro-level analyses (i.e. of social systems and social structure). Read more...


Rules


Links

Associations

Journals

Resources

Interesting Communities

Other Useful Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why am I not allowed to cross the road?

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No one, at any point in this discussion, said anything about crossing the road.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh right, you're on about the swathes of people who just walk down the middle of road as a matter of course. I can't be arsed with this discussion any more. Let's just assume that I acknowledge your 'right' to indiscriminately mow pedestrians down for the crime of 'being in the road'

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're either an absolute moron, or you're being intentionally obtuse.

At no point did anyone support mowing down pedestrians. Stop creating strawmen.

The entire point of this discussion was that wearing dark clothes and walking in the street at night is stupid and dangerous.

I'm not sure why this is such a hard concept for you to grasp.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because I have a right to walk where I want, wearing what I want. To suggest that I must select my clothing to conform some stranger's desire to speed around in a car, paying the bare minimum of attention to the road or conditions, on penalty of death or serious injury, is ridiculous.

Driving so fast that you can't see or react to pedestrians is stupid and dangerous. Why us it such a hard concept for you to understand?

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You do realize that not every road is perfectly flat, straight, or well lit, right?

And no, you don't have a right to walk where you want. Jaywalking laws exist for a reason, and it's because idiots like you think their principals trump the laws of physics.

You also keep talking about speeding. At no point was speeding part of this conversation until you brought it up. Another strawman because you know damn well your argument doesn't make any sense. The speed doesn't matter unless you're expecting everyone to drive 10mph everywhere.

People hit deer all the time for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with excess speed. If any object is in the road, or enters the road, the human reaction time and the vehicle stopping distance might not be enough.

It's your responsibility to stay off of the road if the conditions aren't sufficient for a vehicle going the speed limit to stop in time. Those conditions include your visibility, and your clothing choices affect it.

But, if you are stupid enough to go walking in the road, at night, in dark clothes, please at least register as an organ donor.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You do realize that not every road is perfectly flat, straight, or well lit, right?

You do realise that sensible thing to do on such roads is slow down and drive a speed appropriate to the conditions don't you?

And no, you don't have a right to walk where you want. Jaywalking laws exist for a reason, and it's because idiots like you think their principals trump the laws of physics

I actually do, because I live in a civilised country, but that's besides the point. People don't generally walk done the center of the road, as I already pointed out. The only reason people, generally are in the road, is if they are crossing it. I shouldn't have to base my clothing choice around the likelihood of me needing to cross a road, because you don't understand point 1,above.

You also keep talking about speeding. At no point was speeding part of this conversation until you brought it up. Another strawman because you know damn well your argument doesn't make any sense. The speed doesn't matter unless you're expecting everyone to drive 10mph everywhere.

I am talking about speeding as a synonym for zooming, racing etc. Not exceeding the legal speed limit.

People hit deer all the time for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with excess speed. If any object is in the road, or enters the road, the human reaction time and the vehicle stopping distance might not be enough.

So maybe they shouldn't e driving so fast, and they would be able to react in time to not hit the deer 🤔🤔. Or are you suggesting that deer should wear brighter clothing at night as well?

It's your responsibility to stay off of the road if the conditions aren't sufficient for a vehicle going the speed limit to stop in time. Those conditions include your visibility, and your clothing choices affect it.

So we're back to me not being able to cross a road, incase some entitled driver can't be arsed slowing down a bit. Again the rule is, drive a speed appropriate to the conditions. If it's too dark to see, you should slow the fuck down.

But, if you are stupid enough to go walking in the road, at night, in dark clothes, please at least register as an organ donor.

I don't know where you love that has such an pandemic of people walking in the middle of the road at night, but as I said, mostly I just want to cross the road. I shouldn't have to wear day glow neon and flash like a Christmas tree to do it.

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, since you can't stop throwing up strawmen, I'm done talking to you.

Please register as an organ donor since you think walking in the street at night in dark clothes is perfectly safe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did you just learn the word strawman or something?. You don't have to (incorrectly) throw it into every comment you write...

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A strawman is making an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

You know you can't defeat the argument that walking in the street at night with dark clothes on is stupid and dangerous, so you keep pulling things out of your ass that have literally nothing to do with the discussion to shift the blame to motor vehicle operators.

You also keep blatantly ignoring the points that refute your strawmen, because you know you can't defend your position.

No one said anything about speeding, crossing the road, or anything of that nature.

The entire discussion is about how walking in the road and not being easily visible is dangerous and stupid. That's it. Full stop.

But I know all of this is pointless because you're either a troll arguing in bad faith, or have an IQ lower than the posted speed limit of a residential street.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You also keep blatantly ignoring the points that refute your strawmen, because you know you can't defend your position.

No one said anything about speeding, crossing the road, or anything of that nature.

The entire discussion is about how walking in the road and not being easily visible is dangerous and stupid. That's it. Full stop.

And you are deliberately ignoring everything I've said, such as my explanation of what I meant when I said 'speeding'. I've made myself clear that I am talking about people crossing the road, as there very fewother reasons for people to be in the road, and I don't believe that there are swarms of people just walking in the middle of the road for no reason.

There is no strawman, because the basis of your argument is that people need to make themselves more visible to avoid being hit by cars. The vast majority of accidents, however, occur due to: distracted or inebriated drivers; or drivers driving too fast for the road conditions. Pedestrians will never be visible enough to prevent these accidents, yet you seem to think that the solution to reducing pedestrian accidents is 'more visibility'.

[–] EatYouWell 1 points 7 months ago

You're arguing points that were never part of the discussion and are not related to the discussion at all, trying to refute my argument.

That's a strawman, because no shit it's on speeders and impaired drivers if they hit something. And you keep doing it. Again, at no point were crosswalks, speeding, or impaired driving being discussed. You brought that up unprompted.

Maybe it's not an issue where you live, but where I live people walk down streets (not across them) at night in dark clothes, which is stupid and dangerous.

You also seem to have this belief that the driver has to be doing something wrong to hit a road hazard. You're very wrong.

Again, unless you expect everyone to drive 10mph everywhere, the human reaction speed has its limit. You can be doing everything exactly right and still hit an object in the road that's not supposed to be in the road,especially if it takes a few fractions of a second to be able to see them. People count as an object that doesn't belong in the road.