this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
160 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
6091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 15% of teens say they’re on YouTube or TikTok ‘almost constantly’::A new Pew Research Center study finds that more than 15% of teens say they're on YouTube or TikTok "almost constantly."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tekila 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But you would agree that the rocks themselves cannot have an issue with it? That's the gist of the sentientist position. Sentient beings have an interest in living, not being exploited and thus the sentientist position goes further and say that for the same reasons we say that humans have a right to live (i.e.: not being killed) or being exploited, we should extend the same rights to sentient beings because there is no morally relevant difference between us and other sentient beings that would justify killing them when you would not kill a human being in the same position.

Note that this does not mean all sentient beings should have exactly the same rights. Obviously giving the right to vote to a cow does not make sense, the same way we don't give the right to abortion to cis men because they cannot make use of this right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

we should extend the same rights to sentient beings because there is no morally relevant difference between us and other sentient beings

yes there is.

[–] tekila 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's your morally relevant argument for killing for example cows for taste pleasure and not humans then? What's this special trait humans have that other sentient being do not possess that allows us to do that to them?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

What’s this special trait humans have that other sentient being do not possess that allows us to do that to them?

they aren't human.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

we say that humans have a right

i don't. rights are a fiction.

[–] tekila 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok it feels like you're just starting to spam answers without even taking the time to argument on why you think something. I try to take the time to justify my position and you just answer with small sentences that don't do anything for an interesting discussion.

Let's stop there, have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But you would agree that the rocks themselves cannot have an issue with it?

yea. it doesn't change whether you're practicing discrimination.

[–] tekila 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes I agree in principle that it's a discrimination. They way I used discrimination was implying that someone on the "bad" side of the discrimination could be discriminated against. My bad I should have clearly defined the way I used this term. Sorry English is not my first language as well.

In any case a discrimination that does not hurt the discriminated or another sentient being is of no consequence for me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

so you can see, in this case, NDT was right that vegans also practice speciesism, even if his other arguments are kinda stupid.