this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
1704 points (99.3% liked)
PC Master Race
14860 readers
29 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.
Notes:
- PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's a low-level Microsoft style move. Didn't thought Google will do it
You must not know a lot about Google, lol.
Yup. They did away with the “Do no evil” mantra quite a while ago.
Fun fact, aside from the annoying "this page is better in Chrome" messages on multiple Google sites, Google literally serves a totally different page to Firefox mobile users than mobile Chrome users. It's not a compatible issue, because of you take the user agent settings to claim it's Chrome, magically you get the full Google site. Also add much as I hate to reference Edge... it had significantly better performance on YouTube until magically it didn't anymore. It's almost as if Google purposely made competing browsers slower on their sites, when Edge and more recent Firefox releases work faster on non Google sites. Microsoft even gave up on the original Edge and just forked Chrome.
I use Google maps in a web app that my company has developed. Google maps is much slower in Firefox and Edge than Chrome. It's no accident.
Yes. Youtube is slow as absolute fuck on Firefox, both mobile and desktop.
That hasn't been my experience in many many years, but it was an issue at one time. It's possible that proper content filtering is making up for the difference in performance.