this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
1704 points (99.3% liked)

PC Master Race

14804 readers
74 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZytaZiouZ 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Firefox for life! Well as long as they don't go evil or bankrupt. I am not surprised at all though.

  1. Kneecap plugin performance especially for AdBlock plugins claiming it's for security.
  2. Notify users that those plugins are slowing down Chrome.
  3. ???????
  4. Profit... or people hopefully switch
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

/r/firefox is also still closed and opened up on https://fedia.io/m/firefox. So firefox people are cool in general. 🦊

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox for life

It's not just a Chrome-, it's a Google thing. If you want to install F-Droid or Exodus on Android today, you have to get past Google's warning that you are putting malware on your device.

as they don’t go evil

Well... anyone who packs their advertising through third-party sites has long since defected to the dark side. It seems to me that the ghost of Brendan Eich is still haunting Mozilla.

[–] ZytaZiouZ 1 points 1 year ago

To be somewhat fair there, side loading an app should really have a giant warning, otherwise it would be really easy to trick less knowledgeable users into installing actual malware. It would be nice to have an easier way to install third party app stores, but to install an APK from a website/browser really should have a giant warning.

Worlds better than the competition that outright bans side loading other than a weird "only x number of apps" and "must reinstall every x days".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well as long as they don’t go evil or bankrupt

If they do, there is always LibreWolf.

[–] jmshrv 5 points 1 year ago

Maintaining a browser is an insane amount of work. Without Mozilla working on Firefox, LibreWolf will stagnate and become unusable.

[–] N01R3 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, they've already started cutting some features I have used... So I've got Firefox and Pale Moon on my PC to cover the loss of ftp support. And since some pages don't work in Firefox in either instance of engine, I have to have Chrome installed...

[–] cowmouse 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It genuinely sucks that some websites don't bother to support Firefox! When you encounter one, you might want to complain to the devs and open a webcompat issue.

[–] Bazoogle 4 points 1 year ago

This would also be less of a problem if more people used firefox

[–] Tag365 2 points 1 year ago

So it's like that thing the Internet Explorer is Evil! website complained about back in the day, but now instead of Internet Explorer, it is Google Chrome...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

the proper channels rarely work. apply as an unpaid intern, fix it. quit. always works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have already encountered some websites which didn't work with Chrome very well, but did with Firefox. They mentioned it's because of how Chrome now handles audio, the audio doesn't start.

[–] entropicshart 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their recent advertising of their VPN has set some worrisome trends; here’s to hope they stop that nonsense before we have to move to a fork.

[–] Bazoogle 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's not great, but it's also not the worst. You can also disable it. Chrome gets money by collecting your data to use for advertising purposes. Firefox doesn't do that, so I don't see much harm in them advertising some of their products a couple times a year. Even wikipedia advertises their own donation period, trying to encourage users to donate.

If it were a persistent banner, that would be different. But a one time closable window, that can also be disabled, is really not that terrible. Companies need money, after all.