this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
395 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

60085 readers
4929 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity::It’s part of a worrying trend of non-consensual “deepfake” pornography being developed and distributed because of advances in artificial intelligence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Different only in construction. Why they exist and what they are is older than photography.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing

[–] MotoAsh 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is a quality improvement, not a shift in nature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is:

A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing

B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings.