Privacy

31609 readers

151 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

271

UK porn watchers could have faces scanned (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looks like UK is going the same way as a few states. Spare a thought for us. So messed up this increasing surveillance state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tankplanker 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They would just exempt themselves from it as they did with both reporting on people accessing porn using the HoP network and with the investigatory powers bill.

When they did report on it, it was a shockingly high number for a place of work: https://www.theregister.com/Print/2013/09/04/mps_binge_on_smut_theyre_trying_to_ban/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh, of course they will, was mostly just pointing out the hypocrisy..

And I think the report I was thinking of was more recent, but yeah, the gist is exactly the same.