this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Victoria, BC

378 readers
2 users here now

A Lemmy community for the City of Victoria and the Greater Victoria Region.

Visitor & Tourism Information

Local Weather

Municipalities

Related Communities

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right. However, I am unsure why rail requires being held to some standard of economic viability. Roads don't generate revenue; they're bottomless money pits we throw cash into, as well as societal harm in the form of emissions, accidents, drunk driving, and more. They simply don't make "economic sense". Why must rail?

I don't subscribe to neoliberal rationalizations about every single policy decision. Sometimes (often, even) the best policy decisions cannot satisfy economic rationalization.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Roads are a necessity, and already exist. Rail should compete against road expansion beyond basic two lanes and double lane highways.

They don't even do that though, they're very very expensive for the density we have and municipalities further out are not building the density levels that would make them competitive.