this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
211 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59213 readers
2517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
211
Almost 100,000 Google employees are about to get a hard-fought $20 (www.sfgate.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s to c/technology
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Almost 100,000 Google employees are about to get a hard-fought $20::Google has agreed to pay out $27 million in a settlement, but the 96,939 involved workers will only take home around $45 each.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silly_apples 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From the article

“ That’s about $45 each on average, the lawsuit notes. The actual individual payments will be calculated based on the employee’s tenure with the company, but each one will receive at least a fixed payment of $20, with an additional $22 to $59 tacked on for many.”

The average dollar amount per employee and the amount each employee will actual be paid are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! It’s still peanuts either way, but it’s weird they still tried to spin it like everyone got $20 when many seemed to get more than double that.

[–] isthingoneventhis 2 points 11 months ago

Mm they didn't really spin it though? It's a flat increase to 20$ with tenure tacked on, which is case by case. The person you replied to directly quoted from the article.