Asklemmy

43965 readers

1741 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

You must pick a point in human history before the 1950s to be spend the rest of your life in. What era and place would you choose? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

106 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Dec 31st 1949.

I'm a queer woman, so these sort of time travel questions boil down to preserving as many rights as I can.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

as a queer brown man; i don't want to be anywhere at all.

why 1949 and where?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

You would have been just fine in, say, North or East Africa a few hundred years ago.

I think they picked 49 because it's as modern as they could get within OP's parameters.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Would fit in with the ancient Greeks

[–] LeafOnTheWind 8 points 11 months ago

Maybe back to like ancient Greece or something?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Where, the U.S.? Seems like there's gotta be other times and places that were more woman- and queer-friendly, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'd think places like San Francisco would be better, but 20 years later the Stone Wall riots happened. It was pretty rough all around to be gay in that time, though I'm sure some places were worse than others.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

fwiw: gay nightlife in san francisco was at its zenith in the 50's & 60's .

the san francisco we have today is a tiny dim more conservative ember of what it was back then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What is the significance of that date?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its as close as possible to now before the 50s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, though at that point you'd probably get better results if you went further back. The 50s were...really bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

To be entirely fair I'd probably just ⚡ 🧑🏿‍🦱 ⚡ myself either way. Not willing to try and survive without my meds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you would've been fine in the Roman empire during the Pax Romana.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Rome would kinda suck for a woman, especially a queer one.