this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
202 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

200 readers
2 users here now

wat doing

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I feel this way about open source and the seemingly frequent lack of detailed code reviews. This one project had two function options to use from a library. One handles errors by returning them to the caller so they can be handled gracefully. The other, calls PANIC! They chose the latter and it causes a crash loop for a relatively easy to hit code condition that is sensitive to User input.

Why ask for unit test, in the code review, when you can just accept the contribution for a feature that is used in large corps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I will say I hate having to pester folks to do review on a merge. The place im currently at requires two and its pulling teeth to get folks to look at someone elses code. well except for me I always treat merges as priority as that is ready to go whereas with mine if I have not merged then its not that ready.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Down with the corps?