this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
825 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
3616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
825
PlayStation To Delete A Ton Of TV Shows Users Already Paid For (kotaku.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
222 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

PlayStation To Delete A Ton Of TV Shows Users Already Paid For::Sony says Mythbusters and more Discovery TV shows are going away whether you bought them or not

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xbeam 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not realistic to expect the average user to read and/or understand the TOS when making a purchase like this. The button that you click says buy, not rent until we decide your rental period is over. Shouldn't matter if it's stated in the TOS somewhere.

As far as not spending money on bad platforms, thats what this community is about. All the platforms are proving that they are bad.

[–] CheddarBiscuits -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My issue is the first line of your comment, that it's not realistic for the average user to read and or understand the TOS. You should not use the product if you have not done this. Period. And if you choose to not read and understand, then there is no more discussion to be had... Makes sense?

[–] Xbeam 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the Playstation TOS.

This is the definition of buy.

Expecting a normal person to read this entire document and realize that they changed the definition of buy about 3/4s of the way down from the dictionary definition is completely unreasonable. Read the entire TOS and list all the gotchas, without knowing which ones they are going to pull, then tell me what makes sense.

[–] CheddarBiscuits -1 points 1 year ago

But you're proving my point, it's in the TOS... As I've mentioned in other relies, yes the wording should be changed, but it is there... Reasonable or not it's s in the fine print.

If you do not agree to those fine prints, do not agree to the TOS. You clicked or accepted somewhere at some point, so you do/did agree to this. If you do/did not, why did you accept the TOS in the first place?

I'm trying to drill home that just because you think it's shady, I do too, does not mean you did not agree to it in the first place.

Do not click accept if you do not accept a TOS.