this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)
USA
91 readers
1 users here now
News and Stories of the USA
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For a given level of government services, the amount of revenue needed doesn't really change, so any offsets in one form of taxation must be compensated by another. You might be able to structure things so it doesn't look as bad, and you can attempt to control the distribution of who all is paying, but at the end of the day, the expenses need to be met one way or another.
If you're a renter in Texas, for instance, you might be glad about not getting a state income tax bill, but you're not going to think very much about how a nontrivial chunk of your monthly rent is instead going to pay your landlord's property tax. That might feel better, but mathematically it won't be meaningfully different.
With exception for all the costs associated with trivial bureaucracy from all these agencies and tax collections points.
That's a very important point! Anything involving an appraisal, like property or wealth taxes, are inherently more complex as compared to something like a direct consumption tax.