this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
341 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38563 readers
3024 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two ballistic missiles were fired from Houthi rebel-controlled Yemen toward a US warship in the Gulf of Aden, after the US Navy responded to a distress call from a commercial tanker that had been seized by armed individuals, the US military said Sunday.

The tanker, identified as the Central Park, had been carrying a cargo of phosphoric acid when its crew called for help that “they were under attack from an unknown entity,” the US Central Command said in a statement.

The USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and allied ships from a counter-piracy task force that operates in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia responded to the call for help and “demanded release of the vessel” upon arrival, Central Command said.

“Subsequently, five armed individuals debarked the ship and attempted to flee via their small boat,” said the statement posted on social media platform X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] postmateDumbass 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Balistic missles are not an ideal antiship weapon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

the high angle of attack reduces opportunity for intercept by all but the most advanced and expensive systems. it may seem counterintuitive, but we're not dealing with 1960s ballistic missiles, we can now guide during terminal descent.

[–] postmateDumbass 3 points 9 months ago

So these boston whaler based terrorists have precision guidance and a seeker of some sort? How do they target?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From the description though it seems like these ballistic missiles were about as technologically advanced as a firework.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

yeah I have no doubt iran /whomever has a long long way to go in their development, just don't want to see all ballistics derided because they change the intercept game mightily.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

(Good) Terminal guidance really puts a limit on the speed though, which kind of negates the main advantage of using a ballistic missile (speed).

Even a good ballistic missile will be open for interception longer than say a low observability sea skimmer like LARASM.

[–] Rakonat 3 points 9 months ago

Iran isn't capable or mass producing enough anti ship missiles to give to their terrorist proxy forces so ballsitic missiles it is