this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
58 points (98.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40400 readers
791 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking for a wiki solution (either remotely hosted or self-hosted is fine) that takes Markdown input.

Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dialecticcake 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I switched from Tiddlywiki to Logseq 3-4 months ago and LOVE Logseq.

Part of the reason I didn't like Tiddlywiki was it kept everything in a single html file (including embedded images -- eww) which made it annoying to move information around. (Note there is an option to run your own server which gives you extra flexibility, but I wasn't interested in doing that.)

With Logseq, it's separate markdown file per journal entry / wiki page. I like the addons that are available as well as the queries, e.g., {{query (todo doing)}} displays my do now tasks on my journal page.

Here's a Beginner's Guide on how to use LogSeq: YouTube video by Keep Productive

[–] V4uban 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aren't you worried that Logseq doesn't use "pure" Markdown?

[–] dialecticcake 2 points 1 year ago

Good that you mentioned that. Personally, I think it's a fair trade off for Logseq's functionality.

Here are some links that discuss this including some scripts