this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
8 points (83.3% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers
3 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SignullGone 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm assuming catastrophic leak would mean the US government doesn't get to control the narrative. I'm not sure how the leak would be catastrophic for the average citizen.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • government knew abductions were real and allowed them to go forward as tribute to avoid bigger trouble

  • alien fleet due to arrive in four years and we are sitting ducks

  • we are a genetic experiment, one of many, and our entire history has been shaped by aliens on a whim

  • ancient gods were actually aliens who came here and then left and are coming back

  • we are living in a simulation

  • aliens cause conflict and disease to harvest our psychic energy

  • etc

[–] trolololol 4 points 1 year ago

I'd go with

  • time traveler told us back in Roswell we had until 2030 to get our shirt together or they will publish a book
[–] SignullGone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of the hypothetical points would point to them wanting to control the narrative, in my opinion.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 4 points 1 year ago

That is probably what is going on. The motive of doing their duty of disclosing intentionally according to a plan makes more sense then "cashing in" or "driven by conscience". Either of those are likely for isolated individuals but at this scale it's probably a psyop to prep for an eventual revelation (or something!).

[–] SpruceBringsteen 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

General public perception of the government isn't exactly rosy as it is. It's hard to imagine what sort of leak would be catastrophic in terms of tanking public perception.

[–] SignullGone 3 points 1 year ago

If anything, they could be transparent and put some trust back in the government.